When it comes to coverage of women’s professional sports in this day of dazzling female athletes, I think of the poignant Peggy Lee song and have to ask, “Is that all there is?”
Special Women’s History Month feature. Despite decades of effort to create nonsexist language, the mainstream media are returning to such words as “mankind” and “firemen” in stories and headlines.
Online women’s publications are booming, while print publications are struggling or folding. The trend is a mixed blessing: Online publications reach more and cost less to produce, but historians worry that online publications might not be archived.
While it is significant that Rep. Nancy Pelosi is the first female party leader in Congress, the media and Pelosi’s colleagues have been focusing on that at the expense of talking about her achievements and qualifications.
A new study indicates that newspapers with more women in top-level jobs provide the type of coverage readers say they want: local, people-centered news coverage. Trouble is, most top newsroom women are looking for a way out, not up.
The growing acceptance of women war correspondents is ushering in a new kind of reporting for the new-style war–one in which the casualties are women and children more often than soldiers. Also, three courageous journalists receive recognition.
Women are in TV newsrooms in record numbers–as reporters and directors–yet networks continue to pick middle-aged white males to anchor their news programs.
In the first of our monthly columns on media, Sheila Gibbons dissects coverage of the government’s recent decision to end its study of the possible benefits of hormone replacement therapy. She finds that the media did its job well.
This site uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy.