Campaign Trail

Quest for Women's 2012 Push-Back Vote Begins

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Ultrasounds and welfare drug-testing are just two of this week's news issues that could stoke the fire under HERVotes, a coalition of 50 women's rights groups formed in August that is announcing a major voter-mobilization effort today.

Page 2 of 2

Anti-Abortion Fight Not Over

The controversy and push-back in Virginia, however, isn't discouraging anti-abortion legislators in Idaho and Pennsylvania, where the ultrasound issue is just coming up.

Nor does there appear to be any let-up on the attacks on women living at the edges of survival.

The conservative push for mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients in the program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, or TANF, has produced measures in nearly two dozen states, The New York Times reported Feb. 26, citing the National Conference of State Legislatures. Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney has called it an "excellent idea."

Researchers at the anti-poverty group CLASP--the Center for Law and Social Policy in Washington, D.C.--have found that drug-testing programs cost more to administer than they save by excluding participants, so it's not cost-effective.

Elizabeth Lower-Basch, senior policy analyst at CLASP, told Women's eNews in a phone interview a year ago that the law that instituted TANF does not say that recipients can't use illegal drugs. If states are going to test welfare recipients for "reasonable suspicion," it needs to be written out what that entails so as not to discriminate, she said. "Just because they are poor we can't suspect they are doing drugs."

The Department of Health and Human Services has found that--contrary to some stereotyping--use of illicit drugs is not much higher in families receiving public assistance. In one study they found a 9.6 percent rate of drug usage in the preceding month, compared with a 6.8 percent rate among families who receive no assistance. The administration also found that heavy alcohol use was slightly lower in households receiving assistance than in those that do not.


Would you like to Comment but not sure how? Visit our help page at

Would you like to Send Along a Link of This Story?

For more information:


Poll Position:

5 COMMENTS | Login or Sign Up to post comments


Reproductive Health

Birth-Control Roadblock Just Might Clear in 2014

Economy/Economic Policy

Missouri Welfare Drug-Testing Bill Moves to Senate

Campaign Trail

Republicans Push Pro-Zygote Extremism Over the Top

This program, HERvotes, seems to be especially necessary in the current political climate. Women’s issues (particularly health issues) have come to take the spot light on the Hill. These topics draw attention to the anatomical differences between men and women that can never be reconciled or considered “equal.”
As a woman, I find it hard to listen to men accuse me of being a “slut” for taking birth control, seeing as my birth control regulates my ovarian cysts that cause so much pain I need to be hospitalized. Until you have dealt with the whole host of health issues (recurrent UTIs, ovulation, cysts, yeast infections, period cramps, and the kicker-- child birth) that are unique to my gender, you CANNOT tell me that the efforts I am making to manage those symptoms shouldn’t be covered by my insurance!

Although I am pro-choice, I think we can all agree that we’d prefer fewer women aborting babies. Abortions are unfortunate, invasive, and emotionally devastating to women. But if we want to avoid creating a life that needs to be aborted, we should be provided with ever measure to prevent such circumstances.

I think organizations like HERvotes could help educate women on how important and relevant to their lives these discussions are! Some women who want these right don’t feel threatened by what is going on in congress but they should. With Rush Limbaugh making offensive comments to a panel of all men deciding my fate, I feel that women now, more than ever in my lifetime, need to stand up for their own medical well being before it is trampled on by men who have no idea what we go through.

As a side note-- I found the last segment of the article to be fascinating that drug usage among impoverished families to be similar to that of families receiving no government assistance, and alcohol rates being HIGHER in independent families! I would never have guessed those numbers.

I agree that the HERVotes mobilization of women voters will in all likelihood benefit President Obama. Historically, women are more likely to identify themselves as Democrats than men. The 2008 election paid serious attention to the mobilization of the female vote, especially when Hillary Clinton stepped out of the running. I predict the 2012 elections will once again focus on mobilizing the female vote in an effort to expand the gender gap in favor the Democratic nominee.

Recent controversy, including the Sandra Fluke/ men-only contraception panel, and Republican candidate and candidate supporter contraception and frontline gaffes, have and will continue to benefit President Obama. As mentioned in this article, “women are giving Obama more credit than men are for the country’s economic improvement.” The inability for the Republican party to get in front of and appropriately control their message has alienated many independent and socially moderate women. HERVote can be taken as example of how women are beginning to once again recognize the importance of their mobilization in the midst of a sour political climate.

Continued overt and not-so-overt sexism and the use of policy proposals that disregard a woman’s right to make her own bodily decisions, in conjunction with a drop in unemployment rates and the further improvement of the economy, will pave the way to President Obama’s second term.

The Republicans are in serious danger of alienating an important voting bloc if they continue attacking women on previously resolved issues like access to contraception and equal pay for women. It is a cliche of politics that unmarried women make or break the election for democratic candidates, and this year is no exception. Last month Eric Klinenberg of The Daily Beast wrote an excellent article highlighting the efforts of democratic bigwigs to invigorate and encourage these women, noting that single women “are the largest group of nonvoters,” but they are also typically the most in line with the democratic party platform. Considering this, the recent Republican attacks on women appear to be the perfect opportunity to cement a Republican presidential loss in 2012 and begin a serious campaign for Democrats to regain control over both houses of Congress.

Yet this will only be possible with funding, co-ordination, and a firm strategy backed by all the major players in the Democratic Party. This article indicates that these efforts to mobilize women are at best ill-organized, at worst, half-hearted. The article notes that “HERVotes has a Web site, but no central office or designated leader.” The Democratic party should have learned this lesson by now - you cannot have an effective organization without effective organization. The incredible success of the Democrats in 2008 is due largely to the fact that there was both a central office and a designated leader - the Obama campaign. Looking more recently, the Occupy movement tapped into the energy from the democratic base which is still very much alive, but it was unable to sustain the excitement or translate it into any tangible benefits because of the lack of a central office and a designated leader.

It is great that there is some energy surrounding women’s issues domestically, but currently the movement is relying upon Republican miscalculations - like the Virginia abortion bill, Rush Limbaugh’s misogynistic statements about Georgetown student Sandra Fluke, and the backwards positions of many Republicans regarding women in the military - rather than any tangible excitement orchestrated by Democrats. If women’s groups are serious about using these issues to the advantage of Democrats, they will end the infighting and come up with a unified message and a single leader to direct the movement.

The pushback by women against conservative attacks on basic rights is one of the most tangible things in politics today. Although they have always been used as a political pandering tool, women's health issues have not been placed at the forefront of an election to the degree that they are now for quite some time. From backlash against the Susan G. Komen foundation to the wave of anger directed towards anti-abortion bills requiring transvaginal ultrasounds, both women and men are making their disapproval heard on a large scale. This will no doubt prove advantageous to Democratic candidates in the 2012 election - Republicans cast themselves as more out of touch with mainstream public opinion with every passing day. Their timing could really not be better, especially as the country prepares to vote in November. There is a record number of progressive women candidates running for federal office in 2012, and women are beginning to see that the first step to take in protecting their basic rights is electing women who agree with them and share their experiences. The all-male panel present in Representative Issa's hearing about birth control drove this point home - women need to be represented in Congress as women, not just as Democrats or as Republicans.

There is a grassroots national protest movement against the War on Women, established on Facebook on 2/19. Over 16,000 women and men have signed up so far in only 12 days. The purpose is to provide a forum to exchange information and ideas and to join together at a national and local/state level to protest and act against legislation designed to take away women's rights. In addition to a national page, there are 50 pages established where people from each state can join to plan protests against state legislation in statehouses NOW that might get enacted without swift action. If you believe in the 2012 Push-Back vote, you should also monitor activity in this group, to stop STATE action NOW.

On Facebook, it is called "Organizing against the War on Women".