By Julia Marsh
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
In late November the Baltimore City Council ordered crisis pregnancy centers to post disclaimers and a Maryland county council will debate a similar bill Dec. 10. Pro-choice activists hope other local governments will follow suit.
BALTIMORE (WOMENSENEWS)--Alexa Cole, an organizer for pro-choice NARAL California, watched closely as Maryland counterparts shepherded a first of its kind bill through the Baltimore City Council.
The bill requires the four crisis pregnancy centers located in the city to post disclaimers that clarify what they don't do: provide or refer for abortions or birth control.
The bill, which passed the majority-Catholic City Council by a vote of 12 to 3 on Nov. 23 as a truth-in-advertising, patient protection measure, levies a $150 fine if the centers haven't posted disclosures by the end of a 10-day warning period.
Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon, who is pro-choice, has not yet decided whether she'll sign the bill into law, her spokesperson told Women's eNews earlier this week. In an unrelated twist, the mayor was found guilty of embezzlement yesterday. If Dixon is removed from office, Baltimore City Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake--who happens to be the bill's primary sponsor--will take her place. Rawlings-Blake's spokesperson could not be reached for comment about how this change may impact the bill.
Opponents say any legal challenges would wait until after the bill becomes law.
Forty miles away in Montgomery County, Md., the county council is scheduled to debate a similar bill on Dec. 10.
Cole, who works in San Francisco, said pro-choice advocates on the West Coast are hoping to follow suit.
"I think here in California when we look at their model we're excited and curious as to how we can use the model in our own state," she told Women's eNews.
NARAL and Planed Parenthood branches in California, Oregon and Texas are in the beginning stages of such campaigns.
They're proceeding with caution, though, because similar legislative efforts have failed.
This time the strategy, based in part on the Baltimore model, has three parts:
Most crisis pregnancy centers--there are 4,000 nationwide according to the National Abortion Federation--are run by anti-choice, religious organizations.
Over the past decade, crisis pregnancy centers have spread with help from public funding from state and federal legislators.
NARAL launched the Maryland campaign in January 2008 with a report on the state's 50 crisis pregnancy centers.
The report concluded that women who visited these centers were "given wildly inaccurate" information about health risks associated with abortion "and informed only about the joys of parenting and adoption."
For example, at one center, a staff member gave an investigator, posing as a client, a pair of hand-knitted baby booties.
NARAL then teamed up with Planned Parenthood to present their findings to Rawlings-Blake, who is solidly pro-choice. Rawlings-Blake agreed to craft legislation addressing the issue.
Mark Graber, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law, said that the bill's language avoids freedom-of-speech violations. Graber said that in commercial advertising "you have no right to speech that might be misleading." He said the disclosure required for the pregnancy centers is akin to government-mandated warning labels on cigarette boxes.
The Archdiocese of Baltimore, which fought the bill, said in an e-mail statement to Women's eNews that the centers were unfairly targeted and that the nation's oldest pregnancy center, Baltimore's Center for Pregnancy Concerns, founded in 1980, "never had a complaint filed against it."
By Allison Stevens
Washington Bureau Chief