By Lori Sokol
Friday, February 17, 2012
Gay rights are going strong, but Lori Sokol warns lesbians not to let male allies set the agenda at this critical time. From breast-cancer screenings to LGBT campus curricula there's a lot the male-dominated gay rights movement can overlook.
(WOMENSENEWS)--It's been a good week for gay rights, as Washington became the seventh state in the nation to allow gay and lesbian couples to wed, news that arrived as a day-early Valentine on Feb. 13.
That occurred in the bullish context of the 2012 presidential campaign, which started as the most hostile in the nation's history to the Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender/Intersexed/Questioning community, or LGBTIQ, according to Marriage Equality USA.
But in only six months candidates doubled their pro-equality positions to 48 percent in January 2012, from 24 percent in August 2011.
This momentum is the result of two trends: Pro-equality candidates are increasing their support of more LGBTIQ issues, while anti-equality candidates are ending their campaigns early . . . and this is only the beginning.
Even more change is brewing as battles over marriage and military pay continue in the form of lawsuits, legislation and ballots in 16 states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Washington and West Virginia.
The push toward equality will benefit all members of the gay community, regardless of which gender is leading the charge.
However, there are certain concerns that specifically and solely affect lesbians that are not rising to the top of the gay rights agenda at this crucial time in history when we are on the cusp of change, and lesbians should be taking a stand.
Consider for example the recent scare about the initial--and quickly reversed--decision by Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the cancer charity, to end breast-cancer screening funding for Planned Parenthood.
That should be a wake-up call to the lesbian community. While free breast cancer screening is a service beneficial to all women, the female segment of the gay population should particularly protect this right. The National LGBT Cancer Network, based in New York, reports that lesbians have an increased risk of breast cancer due, in part, to the fact that they are less likely to have biological children before age 30, which has shown to be a factor in offering some protection against cancer.
University campuses also need their own special lesbian call to action.
Today, after years of providing just a smattering of gay-related classes, an increasing number of private colleges are offering multidisciplinary minors in LGBT studies. California's San Diego State University has become the second institution, just behind Hobart and William Smith Colleges in Geneva, N.Y., to offer LGBT studies as a major. This clearly benefits the gay population overall by acknowledging our important social contributions as a group.
But if lesbian contributions are minimized or not adequately represented the negative costs will be significant; the concealing of women's history all over again, to all our detriment.
There's a reason for lesbians not to trust that such issues will naturally rise to the top of the gay agenda: male dominance.
It's something I've personally witnessed at numerous gay professional conferences around the country. Time after time, regardless of the industry represented, I found speakers who were primarily male, declaring and affirming their views about equality in the workplace, in marriage and in society as a whole.
By Krystie Lee Yandoli
By Krystie Lee Yandoli
By Paromita Pain
By Kalpana Bhusal