By Reshmi Kaur Oberoi
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Activists on both sides rushed to Twitter when the Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases this spring that are classic conflicts between religious beliefs and women's right to unbiased health care.
Credit: David Sachs/SEIU on Flickr, under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
(WOMENSENEWS) --The Supreme Court stirred up social media with its Nov. 26 announcement that in 2014 it would hear two lower court cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius, regarding contraceptive coverage in the workplace.
The news fired up both sides of the debate over reproductive rights.
Tweets by Lifenews.com founder Steven Ertelt provide a series of exclamations supporting Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties because they run their business according to Biblical standards.
Liberals claimed opposition to mandate was a Catholic thing, SCOTUS accepts challenges from evangelicals/Mennonites. http://t.co/3IOoUuy2HC
— Steven Ertelt (@StevenErtelt) November 26, 2013
Anti-choice commentator Casey Mattox joined the Twitter outpour.
— Casey Mattox (@AllianceCMattox) November 26, 2013
The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, NARAL Pro-Choice America, took the Supreme Court's decision to grant a hearing as an opportunity to rally behind the need to protect female employees from employers who want to obstruct their access to reproductive health under the guise of religious freedom. NARAL President Ilyse Hogue said in a press statement that there is "an underlying obsession with controlling women's lives" and that those who cite religious beliefs for withholding birth control to their employees are not "pushing to deny men access to Viagra or any other number of similar medical requests covered by insurance."
Under the Obama administration's Affordable Care Act, companies with large work forces are mandated to offer female employees reproductive health coverage, including birth control, without co-pays. Requiring contraceptive coverage for employees is "lawful and essential to women's health," according to the White House on Nov. 26.
But some religious employers argue that complying with the Affordable Care Act is blasphemous. The owners of Hobby Lobby, based in Oklahoma City, say providing contraceptive coverage goes against their spiritual beliefs and infringes on their religious freedom.
It is a slippery slope when for-profit employers make decisions about employees according to their own medical preferences," Cecile Richards, president of PlannedParenthood Federation of America, said in a conference call on Nov. 25, which was hosted by the National Women's Law Center and the ACLU.
"Religious freedom includes the right to worship as you see fit but is also the right of protection from having religious views forced on you," an ACLU representative said during the same call.
U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, a Democrat from Washington State, weighed in on Twitter against the right of companies to disobey the contraceptive coverage mandated by the Affordable Care Act.
— Senator Patty Murray (@PattyMurray) November 26, 2013
In a graphic with a red, white and blue color scheme, NARAL Pro-Choice America lists three statistics to supports its stance that no-cost birth control permitted by health reform is a non-negotiable provision.
— NARAL (@NARAL) November 26, 2013
The anti-choice camp predicts that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of the for-profit companies who choose to impose religious judgment on their employees' coverage.
The White House predicted otherwise in a Nov. 26 tweet: "We are confident the Supreme Court will agree."
Reshmi Kaur Oberoi is an editorial intern with Women's eNews and is a New York-based freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter @ReshmiKO.
Would you like to Comment but not sure how? Visit our help page at http://www.womensenews.org/help-making-comments-womens-enews-stories.
Would you like to Send Along a Link of This Story? http://womensenews.org/story/in-the-courts/131126/high-court-takes-birth-control-activists-ignited
By Sharon Johnson
WeNews senior correspondent
By Malena Amusa
By Christina Caldwell
By Marsha Walton
Teen Voices at Women's eNews
By Louisa Reynolds
WeNews staff reporter
By Caryl Rivers and Rosalind C. Barnett
By Cynthia Hess
By Ann Marie Cunningham
By Hajer Naili