By Katherine Greenier
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Abortion providers in Virginia are under orders to make onerous architectural changes to their facilities under a politicized regulation process. Katherine Greenier says there's still time to save these facilities and act in the interests of women's health.
(WOMENSENEWS)--Separate rooms for telecommunications and computer equipment.
Drinking fountains in waiting rooms.
Six-inch handles on all sinks.
Larger procedure rooms.
Such burdensome architectural changes are unrelated to patient safety and could cost providers a minimum of tens of thousands of dollars.
And that's the point.
By ordering these changes be made within two years, Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, one of the nation's staunchest anti-abortion leaders, is doing his part in the nationwide process of chipping away at abortion access.
Until Jan. 1, when the "emergency" rules took effect, abortion providers in the state were regulated as standard outpatient service providers performing standard outpatient procedures.
A committee of physicians interpreted the new temporary law as exempting clinics now in operation. The state's attorney general disagreed and insisted the architectural changes be made within the two-year time line. This is not necessarily the end of the debate.
Given the expense of the required changes, high-quality health care providers now offering essential services to women and families in Virginia could either close or make the costs of a procedure prohibitive for many women.
In the process, women's access could be restricted to such important basic care as cancer screenings, gynecological exams, prenatal care, sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment and birth control.
However, permanent regulations to supersede the emergency rules are being now being considered.
Thus, there is a still chance to undo or reverse the emergency regulations.
The Board of Health can still decide which permanent regulations to apply to women's health centers when the temporary regulations expire (at no specified time).
These health authorities can still create rules for women's clinics that are medically appropriate and that rely on the advice of health care professionals, not the mandates of politicians opposed to reproductive freedom.
At issue here are so-called TRAP laws (Target Regulation of Abortion Provider).
By Marley Gibbons
By Maura Ewing
By Thais Moraes
By WeNews staff
By Juhie Bhatia
By Ann Marie Cunningham
By Léa Bouchoucha
By Hajer Naili
By Anna Halkidis
By Rita Henley Jensen
By Anita R. Johnson
By AWWP commentatore
By Jess McCabe
By Diane Kiesel
By Rosalind C. Barnett and Caryl Rivers
By Rita Henley Jensen
By Eryn Ashleigh
By Cyrille Cartier