Economy/Economic Policy

Debt-Ceiling Bill Called Bad Business for Women

Friday, August 5, 2011

Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security were spared immediate cuts in this week's deal to raise the government's borrowing limit. But long-term threats are seen to the programs women disproportionately depend on.

(WOMENSENEWS)--The debt-ceiling agreement in Washington this week left women's advocates fuming over looming spending cuts.

"Republicans in Congress have made a clear choice: They are standing with millionaires and billionaires rather than with average Americans who depend on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid," said Nancy Altman, co-chair of the Strengthen Social Security Campaign, in press statement on Aug. 2, the day lawmakers raised the limit on government borrowing by $400 billion immediately and planned another $500 billion increase by February.

Altman supported Democrats' arguments that more revenue should be raised through higher taxes on the country's wealthiest people rather than reducing program costs to lower the country's federal deficit of over $14 trillion.

Bookmark and Share

Currently, the highest earners in the United States pay an income tax rate of 35 percent compared to a peak of 94 percent in 1945, according to records from the Tax Foundation.

Many women's advocates agree that the federal deficit must be reduced and the budget should be balanced.

But not Susan Feiner, director of women's studies and a professor of economics at the University of Southern Maine in Portland and a columnist for Women's eNews.

In a phone interview this week Feiner said the debt-crisis atmosphere was artificial. She said a balanced-budget amendment--requiring government tax revenue and expenses to be equal--would be a recipe for economic disaster.

If the national income starts to fall, pulling tax receipts with it, government spending typically brakes the downturn and helps to prop up private sector spending by households and firms. A balanced budget would create a permanent recession, Feiner said.

Entitlements Spared in Round No. 1

Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (and the Child Health Insurance Program)--the so-called big, expensive entitlement programs--were spared immediate cuts in the first phase of $900 billion cuts in the upcoming six months.

But reductions in all or some of those programs are widely expected to be some part of the long-term bargain of the bill.

These programs represent about 41 percent of the total federal budget, according to the Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The average monthly Social Security check for a woman is $1,000, and most times that is her only source of income, Cynthia Hess, study director of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, based in Washington, D.C., said in a phone interview.

Medicare--the public health care program for the disabled and elderly--covers 70 percent of costs for nursing homes and programs for the disabled. A majority of those recipients are women, said Hess.

The bill portions $2.4 trillion cuts into two rounds.

Entitlement cuts are widely feared in the second round when a 12-member bipartisan "super committee" of lawmakers is charged with proposing a package by late November that would reduce the deficit by between $1.2 trillion and $1.5 trillion through a combination of spending cuts and revenue increases, such as tax hikes or ending tax breaks.

The committee's plan will sink or swim in Congress, with no input from other lawmakers. If a package can't be approved automatic cuts would start taking effect in 2013.

Some of those automatic cuts would land on Medicare, said Gwendolyn Mink, co-editor of the two-volume "Poverty in the United States: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics and Policy," in an Aug. 1 release by The Institute for Public Accuracy.

1 COMMENTS | Login or Sign Up to post comments


Economy/Economic Policy

Default Fears Clip Fight for Women's Retirement

Economy/Economic Policy

Hochul Win Sends Hands-Off-Medicare Message

Economy/Economic Policy

GOP's Block-Grant Plan Merits the Chopping Block

Economy/Economic Policy

Government Red Ink: A Girl's Best Friend

I totally agree with the view expressed in this article. This is a disgusting result; Republicans fought President Obama for months while he and his group tried to find a compromise that would have enabled some help from Republicans through increased taxation while also offering some decrease in spending. How can Congress and Senate men and women let such cave-in to the extreme wealthy corporations stand?! I hope millions of Americans begin repeated peaceful actions to get the message across that this is irresponsible governance.